This makes sense, as Utah officials now *are* recognizing the marriages of same-sex couples.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@chrisgeidner Appellees' costs and fees? Why not Appellants' costs and fees? -
@urihoresh Appellees are the same-sex couples. The state was the appellant because it lost below. -
@chrisgeidner I understand. Then why do the couples have to pay a fee and not the state? The state lost, didn't it? -
@urihoresh NOOOOO. Attorneys fees means the state will have to pay the plaintiffs' attorneys' fees. -
@chrisgeidner Yes... I understood my error as soon as I hit Return following my last tweet. Sorry :-)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@abenomixx Gene Schaerr, but he wasn't going to argue for UT at SCOTUS. John Bursch had been added to the team for that.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.