@chrisjohnson82 They're not quite sure yet. Look at the last sentence of the statement and see here: http://bit.ly/1iGP1bl
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner Confirmed for me too they don't whether en banc or#SCOTUS is next step. But seems like#SCOTUS is ultimate destination.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisjohnson82
@chrisjohnson82 Well, if they go en banc and win they wouldn't be filing a cert petition, but, yes.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@chrisjohnson82 Word on the street here in SLC is en banc is a longshot. Everyone going to SCOTUS.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @BenWinslow
@BenWinslow@chrisjohnson82 Yes, en banc is a longshot & I don't imagine any lawyer will ultimately advise it. But, they're still deciding.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@BenWinslow Would there any advantage to en banc other than delaying a decision from#SCOTUS?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisjohnson82
@chrisjohnson82@BenWinslow If you thought you could get a win. You always would, ideally, want to arrive at SCOTUS on the winning side.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@BenWinslow Why would SCOTUS care what the full 10th Circuit decides? SCOTUS is the high court and can do what it wants.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisjohnson82
@chrisjohnson82@BenWinslow … one, you'd be more likely to go for that than getting to the court off two losses.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@BenWinslow You haven't explained why it would influence SCOTUS. Won't it look to Windsor for precedent, not 10th Circuit?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@chrisjohnson82 @BenWinslow Yes, it does whatever it wants. But, going UP TO the court, you want it to be on as good of terms as possible.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.