@chrisgeidner Interesting. Seems SCOTUS can't wholly disregard testimony in a case if it applies to the writing of their opinions in another
-
-
-
@matbreen Well, no, they can't. But Ted's point, though he jumps around, is that Robbie made similar arguments in her brief as he did. -
@chrisgeidner plausible, if they prepped together. No question he's taking credit, but supremes probably won't say how much credit he's due -
@matbreen I actually don't think he's taking credit in this answer. I think he, nicely, refutes one of Becker's biggest errors.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner On 1st read I thought it was hubris, but perhaps Perry did have an effect on Windsor, and perhaps vice-versa. Isn't impossible -
@matbreen Of course they had an effect. That isn't in question. Becker said much more than that on pg. 418. - End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.