"No decision, according to sources" would be just as troubling as "decision expected, according to sources." Court doesn't work like that.
-
-
-
Replying to @MikeSacksEsq1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@gabrielmalor Courts should announce when they'll be handing down opinions. Barring that, judges and clerks should leak.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeSacksEsq
@chrisgeidner@gabrielmalor http://M.D.Pa didn't hurt anyone when it said its SSM decision would be coming down last week.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MikeSacksEsq
@chrisgeidner@gabrielmalor California Supreme Court doesn't hurt anyone when they announce when they'll hand down newsworthy decisions.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @MikeSacksEsq
@MikeSacksEsq @gabrielmalor Right, then it is on the record. It's not anonymous sourcing.
9:36 AM - 23 May 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.