.@chrisgeidner A propos your story, http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/appeals-court-could-reconsider-whether-anti-gay-laws-get-mor … are there any en bancs being granted when both parties oppose it?
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen You mean, have there ever been, or are there currently? (I don't know either way, but thought I should ask.)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@rickhasen Is it conceivable to have an universally opposed en banc rehearing & still satisfy Article III requirements?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AnthonyMKreis
@AnthonyMKreis@rickhasen Totally. Three-judge panels are just conveniences. They're speaking for the full court, effectively.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@rickhasen Makes sense. But even 9th Cir's "en banc" isn't the full court. Feels like a rabbit hole for judicial overreach.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@AnthonyMKreis @rickhasen Right. It's "limited en banc." And, I get that concern, but, "the circuit" is all the judges, and I don't ...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.