How liberals learned to stop worrying & love standing doctrine: http://wapo.st/1hY6YwU @scotusreporter @adamliptak @SCOTUSblog @David_Ingram
-
-
Replying to @EVKontorovich
@EVKontorovich@scotusreporter@adamliptak@David_Ingram Implies that "liberals" _categorically_ oppose standing. Where is support for that?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steve_vladeck
@steve_vladeck no, i think i made it clear that i meant on the whole (and liberals and conservatives of course both also generalizations)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EVKontorovich
@EVKontorovich But at that level of generality, your critique is unfair. One can oppose margins of standing & still think its core matters.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steve_vladeck
@steve_vladeck I'll put it this way: when court breaks 5-4 on standing, conservatives will be against, liberals for.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EVKontorovich
@EVKontorovich Even if that's true (and it isn't; see, e.g., Prop. 8), it just proves difference at margins, not your orig. claim re: Obama.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steve_vladeck
@steve_vladeck@EVKontorovich I've said it before, I'll say it again: only principled actors in Prop8 standing decision: Scalia & Sotomayor.6 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
@MikeSacksHP @steve_vladeck @EVKontorovich Also: Notable that Olson was behind the case that led to a ruling further restricting standing.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.