@notsalome @sahilkapur @nycsouthpaw It's a non-jurisprudence that Kern called out as such in the opinion.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@notsalome@sahilkapur right, either way it's decided there's an equal chance of reversal bc AMK effectively hides the ball1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nycsouthpaw
@nycsouthpaw@chrisgeidner@normative nobody seems to dispute where AMK is headed. But I still can't imagine this being easy for judges.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sahilkapur
@sahilkapur@chrisgeidner@normative yeah, but I can also imagine it being really fun for judges2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nycsouthpaw
@nycsouthpaw@chrisgeidner@normative hypothetical: judges force 14A issue to SCOTUS, AMK+4 say no constitutional right to marry. Then what?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@sahilkapur @nycsouthpaw @normative Then, advocates would push the state route, increase the majority, and go back. Bowers --> Lawrence
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.