.@chrisgeidner I'll be surprised if DOJ differs on Utah #SSMs; Windsor said fed can't trump state definitions (right now; long term TBD).
@AppellateDaily Yes, bc the state expanded the protections, the fed had no legit reasons to limit. The opposite scenario is not discussed.
-
-
@chrisgeidner Right, the opposite scenario is an open question, and I don't see DOJ stepping in to answer it w/o further guidance. -
@AppellateDaily And I don't think this is that opposite scenario. The state doesn't say these are invalid marriages. -
@chrisgeidner That's a whole different string! Anyway, it will be interesting to see what happens. - End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.