@rickhasen @adamliptak Your discussion of what that "status quo" is is specifically dismissed in Shelby's stay denial, FWIW.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@adamliptak my discussion of status quo? from where?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@adamliptak Shelby says that status quo is that same-sex couples can marry; that is the status quo.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
.
@chrisgeidner@adamliptak Larger point is that to#SCOTUS, until last week, no SSM in Utah. Last peaceable status quo before court order.1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@adamliptak But, & this is the point I made prior to the 10th Cir denial: Same-sex couples are marrying now & that has an impact.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@adamliptak No doubt, but it cuts both ways. Stopping things now may stem the tide if you are Scalia, Thomas, Alito.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@adamliptak I completely agree. "Stopping things now ..." = Status quo is same-sex couples marrying. ;-)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@adamliptak No. Because courts generally interpret status quo to mean last peaceable status quo before litigation.3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@adamliptak I get what you are saying, Rick. I'm saying the reality here is different than your antiseptic analysis.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@adamliptak I think what you are going to is about reliance interests. I don't expect those to sway conservatives on Court.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@rickhasen @adamliptak Look at my tweets: I'm not talking about the justices, Rick.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.