@soy_patria @samknight1 It only becomes a Sec. 2 question if Soc Sec Admin requires adherence to state law for provision of a fed benefit.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@soy_patria@samknight1 don't suppose it's easy as looking at the statute online? Probably not, bet its buried in rulemaking1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @msilverman
@msilverman@soy_patria@samknight1 If it was in statute, wldn't there be denial? It seems sub-statutory reqs must b involved, at most, yes?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@msilverman@soy_patria@samknight1 There's a statute: http://www.volokh.com/2013/08/10/social-security-administration-takes-different-view-of-marital-choice-of-law/ …4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @WilliamBaude
@crescat Also: I think we'd know a lot more if we could find "EM-13022 REV," which appears to be an internal access-only document.
11:04 PM - 9 Aug 2013
0 replies
1 retweet
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.