@chrisgeidner @dmcrawford @RyanNewYork Just a state requires a ballot initiative for marriage doesn't mean it's a good idea right now.
-
-
Replying to @ZackFord
@ZackFord@dmcrawford@RyanNewYork whoa, nelly! never said it was.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@dmcrawford@RyanNewYork I know, but I think that's an underlying assumption of this discussion.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ZackFord
@ZackFord@dmcrawford@RyanNewYork No one has said states should go to the ballot without the numbers.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@dmcrawford@RyanNewYork It's not just the numbers though. Campaign infrastructure is important too. Ian James doesn't have it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ZackFord
@chrisgeidner@dmcrawford@RyanNewYork That's obviously why the other groups pulled on the reins. They're not all on the same page.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ZackFord
@ZackFord@dmcrawford@RyanNewYork You. Don't. Say. (Duh.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@dmcrawford@RyanNewYork Condescension aside, then, it sounds like we all kind of agree...?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ZackFord
@ZackFord@dmcrawford@RyanNewYork No. You went down to the micro level of James, & I don't think anyone wanted to see him run the campaign.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@ZackFord@RyanNewYork Okay all, I'm going back to working aggressively to win marriage in more states. Good chat. Laters.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@dmcrawford @ZackFord @RyanNewYork Well played. Carry on. ;-)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.