@adammc123 it's my opinion on what I'm seeing. What's yours?
@alexivorbond @me4scotus @adammc123 It's not accurate, aside from the whole "every senator wants to be president" thing. I think it's ...
-
-
@chrisgeidner@alexivorbond@adammc123 I disagree. I think if hill didn't run then a Warner/McCaskill or O'Malley/Same is highly likely -
@me4scotus@alexivorbond@adammc123 ... in the party, more broadly. (A point you acknowledge w your McCaskill VP nod. No primary there.) -
@chrisgeidner@alexivorbond@adammc123 maybe I'm just much more cynical than u guys. And I'm not saying it always was as such, in fact... -
@me4scotus@alexivorbond@adammc123 Um. Adam said it's about money; I said about any advancement in the party. Don't know what you mean. -
@chrisgeidner@alexivorbond@adammc123 everything in politics is either about money or advancement. I'm talking about ambition -
@me4scotus@alexivorbond@adammc123 ugh. again: we all said the same. -
@chrisgeidner@alexivorbond@adammc123 yea, I guess we are only debating semantics
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.