@chrisgeidner @journosnow ? Congressional Ds may have something useful to add re DOMA -- many voted on it in 1996. What to say re Prop 8?
-
-
Replying to @pgofhsm
@pgofhsm@chrisgeidner It'd be a different story if two Republicans hadn't declared a constitutional right to marry. That changes things2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JustinCSnow
@journosnow@chrisgeidner full list of Lawrence amici at http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/supreme_court/docket/2002/march.html … nothing from Dems qua Dems (sorry Coalition not Council)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pgofhsm
@pgofhsm@journosnow And, of course, it was about a criminal law, not marriage. I'm not sure how this is relevant at all.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@journosnow relevance I see is whether having some Rs file a brief supporting LGBT rights = Ds automatically should do same1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pgofhsm
@pgofhsm@journosnow I don't think they should for that reason. As I said, I think Jud Comte Dems cld lead a powerful brief.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@pgofhsm Similar problem Obama admin is also facing -- they come out swinging at DOMA but silent on other key case3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JustinCSnow
@journosnow@chrisgeidner ...the most expansive possible resolution to Prop 8 (SSM is constl right in every state; states don't decide)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pgofhsm
@pgofhsm@journosnow The WH arg on DOMA - heightened scrutiny - fits hand in glove with Olson/Boies' arg on Prop 8.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@journosnow also WH discusses rational basis + of Lawrence & Cleburne3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@pgofhsm @journosnow The WH will file tomorrow or they won't in Prop 8. Same w others. We'll see then.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.