@JakeReif I cannot "dismiss" you when I've engaged you for an extended period of time. You've made no point, let alone a logical one.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner not some abstract notion of what is "logical". Logic is objective, and your argument is logically flawed. That's all there is.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner That was not what I said. A Ga. journo could (and should!) use the DC definition. But he could also logically use Ga's.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner If Georgia's own law can deem a DC married couple not "married", why can a journalist not do so? He shouldn't, but he could.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner It absolutely does. That's what recognition means. DC says yes, married. Ga says no, not. AP says... (what they decide)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner I think Bloom is full of crap. AP's decision is dumb, stupid, unreasonable, irrational, etc. Just not "incorrect" as you claim1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.