@JakeReif It is incorrect, your comments are illogical, and I am done. http://media.tumblr.com/e696d565b6a75bf2c98212f289bf8d9d/tumblr_inline_mgueteo2iL1ra13nv.gif …
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner ok, whatever. Dismiss me if you will, but my argument wasn't "illogical" by any means. You're just assuming your own premise.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner not some abstract notion of what is "logical". Logic is objective, and your argument is logically flawed. That's all there is.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner That was not what I said. A Ga. journo could (and should!) use the DC definition. But he could also logically use Ga's.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner If Georgia's own law can deem a DC married couple not "married", why can a journalist not do so? He shouldn't, but he could.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner It absolutely does. That's what recognition means. DC says yes, married. Ga says no, not. AP says... (what they decide)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner you were welcome to stop responding to me at any time. I chose not to. Have a good one.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.