@JakeReif You're now arguing against yourself, even if you don't know it.
@JakeReif There is no logic to your argument that a Georgia journalist should just ignore DC law when writing about a DC couple.
-
-
@chrisgeidner That was not what I said. A Ga. journo could (and should!) use the DC definition. But he could also logically use Ga's. -
@JakeReif Not when describing a DC married couple. -
@chrisgeidner If Georgia's own law can deem a DC married couple not "married", why can a journalist not do so? He shouldn't, but he could. -
@JakeReif That is Georgia's decision whether to legally recognize their marriage. It does not change whether or not they *are* married. -
@chrisgeidner It absolutely does. That's what recognition means. DC says yes, married. Ga says no, not. AP says... (what they decide) -
@JakeReif Go find Jeffrey Bloom, and you and he can have a good evening. The rest of us think you're absolutely incorrect. -
@chrisgeidner I think Bloom is full of crap. AP's decision is dumb, stupid, unreasonable, irrational, etc. Just not "incorrect" as you claim -
@JakeReif It is incorrect. We disagree. We will not resolve this. Good night.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.