@JakeReif Bc states define marriage. Hence, why it's a question of whether fed govt recognizes marriages, not whether they *are* marriages.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner fine, then not fed govt, other states. Why must a writer in Georgia use the New York definition of marriage, not Georgia's?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner it's definitely inaccurate proves too much1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner we should look to the definition of marriage in the state were in, or under the federal gov't. Not persuasive, but logical4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner logical =/= reasonable. The decision may be a bad one, but its not an objectively incorrect one.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeReif
@JakeReif It is incorrect, your comments are illogical, and I am done. http://media.tumblr.com/e696d565b6a75bf2c98212f289bf8d9d/tumblr_inline_mgueteo2iL1ra13nv.gif …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner ok, whatever. Dismiss me if you will, but my argument wasn't "illogical" by any means. You're just assuming your own premise.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.