It's not that it's "wrong" as a political or philosophical thing; it's factually wrong, and the @APStylebook is simply inaccurate.
@JakeReif You're now arguing against yourself, even if you don't know it.
-
-
@chrisgeidner it's definitely inaccurate proves too much -
@JakeReif There aren't "logic arguments to the contrary." So, I'm lost on what point you think you have here. -
@chrisgeidner we should look to the definition of marriage in the state were in, or under the federal gov't. Not persuasive, but logical -
@JakeReif No, it's not at all logical. -
@chrisgeidner logical =/= reasonable. The decision may be a bad one, but its not an objectively incorrect one. -
@JakeReif It is incorrect, your comments are illogical, and I am done. http://media.tumblr.com/e696d565b6a75bf2c98212f289bf8d9d/tumblr_inline_mgueteo2iL1ra13nv.gif … -
@chrisgeidner ok, whatever. Dismiss me if you will, but my argument wasn't "illogical" by any means. You're just assuming your own premise. -
@JakeReif No, your non-argument is completely illogical. Sorry.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisgeidner well I was taught to do that in law school. But I'd just say that as long as there are logic arguments to the contrary, sayingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.