@HeerJeet @normative well, that's my point. that's not a difference.
-
-
Replying to @normative
@normative@HeerJeet That's how I have always understood it too. But I just dont think it's a real distinction.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative@HeerJeet a subset of lying. the 'intellectual' part is just promotional.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joshtpm1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
-
Replying to @normative
@normative@joshtpm@HeerJeet Not so. Lawyer's job is to argue the law as well as can be done for their side w the facts. Not be dishonest.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@joshtpm@heerjeet That was rather my point1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative@joshtpm@HeerJeet I just think it's missing the point of the legal profession to call a lawyer intellectually dishonest.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner@joshtpm@heerjeet I said "a good lawyer" to acknowledge that intellectual honesty is not an appropriate virtue for a lawyer.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@normative @joshtpm @HeerJeet A good lawyer is being intellectually honest by understanding their role in the system: to advocate a side.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.