House Rules In New Congress Allow Continued #DOMA Defense: http://bit.ly/UmXWNv
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner I don't quite get why this new rule was even necessary -- what does it change? Weren't they already defending DOMA?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MattBaume
@MattBaume The new House of the 113th Congress would need the new rule. Technically, things don't continue from one House to the next.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner Ah -- so they had a similar rule for the 112th Congress?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @MattBaume
@MattBaume No, because the litigation started in the 112th Congress. There was the BLAG vote in March 2011 that authorized the defense.
5:45 PM - 3 Jan 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.