#SCOTUS news re: Windsor technically just means court wants args on this. What it *could* mean depends on where Jackson/SCOTUS go w it.
-
-
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner If BLAG doesn't have standing though, seems clear Prop 8 supporters couldn't either, no?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner True, but hard to see the logic for standing in Perry but not Windsor. Cong. can at least point to future legislation affected1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.