#SCOTUS news re: Windsor technically just means court wants args on this. What it *could* mean depends on where Jackson/SCOTUS go w it.
@JakeReif Not necessarily. They've got the Calif Sup Ct ruling on their side.
-
-
@chrisgeidner True, but hard to see the logic for standing in Perry but not Windsor. Cong. can at least point to future legislation affected -
@JakeReif Not sure I agree.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.