@chrisgeidner So the Nevada ruling means a serious conflict in federal court opinion, right? Isn't that what the Supremes like to sort out?
-
-
Replying to @treygraham
@treygraham The judge actually made clear to point that out.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
@chrisgeidner But wait: Hasn't some other fed-level court ruled that heightened scrutiny applies? Wouldn't that be enough for the Supremes?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @treygraham
@treygraham Also: It's called a "Circuit split" when they talk about the split of court opinion. There are always wild-card trial opinions.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.