@chrisgeidner @mckaycoppins In fact, didn't even say "significant leads". They didn't say anything. Seems a huge leap in assumptions.
@mckaycoppins Not saying they have "significant leads" in a state now = "thinks they'll lose"?
-
-
-
@mattmfm@mckaycoppins Huh? Plouffe said they had "significant leads" in OH/IA/NH/NV. Wouldn't say same about NC/VA/FL. -
@chrisgeidner@mckaycoppins Sounds as if Plouffe specifically mentioned the 4 and by not mentioning others Garrett assumes they're conceded.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.