We've had a few times already this administration where the Vacancies Reform Act has mattered. Remember Sally Yates? The summer talk about Sessions? Rich Cordray and the CFPB? Shulkin and the VA?
-
-
Show this thread
-
The law is an attempt to keep government offices running smoothly when an important office is vacant, and it is found in 5 USC 3345 —>https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/3345 …
Show this thread -
In the case of the Justice Department, a presidential executive order setting forth the order of succession at DOJ has been issued —>https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-executive-order-providing-order-succession-within-department-justice/ …
Show this thread -
There also is a statute about who takes over at DOJ to handle the "duties of the office of Attorney General" in certain circumstances: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/508 …pic.twitter.com/airEJsFaT7
Show this thread -
Under *that* law, the AG can set his or her *own* order of succession. Former AG Lynch had an order in place, which DOJ previously told us Sessions did not alter. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4361252/DOJ-Succession-Memo.pdf …pic.twitter.com/UywPSREAx9
Show this thread -
Wait, though, how can there be two laws controlling what appears to be the same thing? Because there are! And DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel previously said that's cool. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/opinions/attachments/2015/06/01/op-olc-v031-p0208.pdf …pic.twitter.com/IHmPstYduX
Show this thread -
The big difference between the two options is that Trump would have the ability to appoint someone to serve as acting deputy attorney general under the FVRA. The other law, meanwhile, just sets forth a list of people who can serve.
Show this thread -
One big question people are asking today is about whether the FVRA applies when a person is fired. Back when the law went into effect, OLC acknowledged the law was not clear, but suggested that firing was intended to be covered. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/opinions/1999/03/31/op-olc-v023-p0060_0.pdf …pic.twitter.com/5vaM1H9wtX
Show this thread -
There is some debate on this point, and it became an issue when Shulkin left the VA. Here are two stories about that: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/31/did-shulkin-get-fired-or-resign-veterans-492877 … /https://www.lawfareblog.com/federal-vacancies-reform-act-and-va-study-uncertainty-and-incompetence …
Show this thread -
The other issue here is that, due to Sessions' recusal, both laws could be applicable. If Rosenstein resigns or is fired, DOJ has said previously that an "acting" DAG would not take over for matters in which the AG is recused.
Show this thread -
As such, either 508 would control, or the FVRA could apply to most of Rosenstein's duties (if Trump chose an acting DAG) and 508 would apply to recused matters.
Show this thread -
For a look on who Trump could choose as acting DAG under the FVRA — and it's a big group — see this story from me and
@jsvine (about Sessions, but, still within DOJ) —>https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/chrisgeidner/a-cast-of-thousands-of-possible-acting-ags …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
GIVE US THE GOOD SHIT CHRIS
-
the purported distinction between resignation and termination under a boring 20-year-old federal law is the hottest topic of the day, what a time to be alive
-
And yet, funny that people who often point to OLC opinions for authoritative takes in this case seem happy to put aside OLC opinions. And legislative history. In other words, this isn't a bottom-line issue – at least not as to SCO. YMMV.
-
And there's this from Senator Thompson...https://twitter.com/KDbyProxy/status/974339478516064257 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@threadreaderapp ''unroll'', please. -
Hallo the unroll you asked for: Thread by
@chrisgeidner: "SO. I hear people are curious about the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 this morning. Here's a thread. We've had a […]" https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1044247507423907840.html … Talk to you soon.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I understand it doesnt apply if the appointed officer is fired, thus if R makes the WH fire him trump cant put his guy in
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.