To understand this tweet — https://twitter.com/cstrohm/status/1042225884743311361?s=21 … — read this story from yesterday: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-09-17/white-house-is-said-not-to-ask-fbi-to-vet-kavanaugh-allegations …
-
-
Lol. Read the articles. Not at all based on my opinion, based on reported, easily ascertainable facts. :) Also I’m not “spouting off”. I’m noting the differences between the situations, differences you gloss over because you want to smear Hatch’s statement as “odd”
-
The differences have nothing to do with whether the FBI can do a background investigation.
-
The differences have everything to do with Hatch’s tweet on whether the FBI does investigations “like this”. “Like this”= specifically meaning the circumstances surrounding this allegation. Which makes the many differences b/w this case and the others imperative to understand.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.