Feinstein, in a new statement, also questions the two-witness plan —>pic.twitter.com/wLx4Qv44L0
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Of the Republican process, which Hirono calls a "smearing," she says, "This is so patently unfair."
On the Republican side, Majority Leader McConnell says that the main purpose of raising the issue is to delay the nomination. Cornyn says Republicans have offered Ford the choice of testifying at an open or closed session.
Really important thread from @pdmcleod —>https://twitter.com/pdmcleod/status/1042125234822938626 …
Trump talks about Kavanaugh's earlier FBI background checks and says he feels bad for Kavanaugh. "This is not a man that deserves this," he says.
Trump, after going on at length about Democratic obstruction, returns to Kavanaugh: "I feel terribly for him, for his wife ... and for his ... daughters. I feel terribly for them."
In his answer, Trump did not mention Dr. Ford or her allegation of sexual assault against Kavanaugh, nor did he express any feelings about her.
This is the closest Trump came to mentioning what was at issue: "Hopefully the woman will come forward, state her case. He will state his case before representatives of the United States Senate."
The Kavanaugh developments have not only delayed his nomination vote — but also led to the cancellation of the entire executive committee meeting that was set for Thursday. An appeals court nominee and eight district court nominees also had been on the agenda.pic.twitter.com/ezIJNZwoAC
Here were the other nominees who were set to be considered:pic.twitter.com/Nrrm80v9By
Through a lawyer, Mark Judge, who Ford wrote in her letter also was in the room, sent a statement to the Judiciary Committee and says he doesn't want to speak publicly about the matter. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetillman/brett-kavanaugh-accuser-hearing …pic.twitter.com/hi9tgGg2Nk
This evening’s developing story —>https://twitter.com/pdmcleod/status/1042216939618222082?s=21 …
To understand this tweet — https://twitter.com/cstrohm/status/1042225884743311361?s=21 … — read this story from yesterday: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-09-17/white-house-is-said-not-to-ask-fbi-to-vet-kavanaugh-allegations …
Chair Grassley, meanwhile, issued a statement responding to the letter from Dr. Ford’s lawyers. In notable part, Grassley says that, in his view, no further investigation from the FBI is needed before she testifies.pic.twitter.com/cHs44ds3xm
OK, some things to clear up from Sen. @OrrinHatch — a former chair of the committee. He tweeted a few odd things tonight. First, there was this:https://twitter.com/senorrinhatch/status/1042216779043491840 …
Here's Ginni Thomas, Clarence Thomas's own wife, writing about what happened in 1991, when accusations from Anita Hill were raised after the first committee hearings had been completed: https://people.com/archive/cover-story-breaking-silence-vol-36-no-18/ …pic.twitter.com/RFP8Hg00YJ
So, it's not really clear what he's talking about here.
Then, there's this. First of all, the statement came from a DOJ spokesperson — not the FBI. Second, that does not resolve the question I referenced in the earlier tweet about the Bloomberg reporting on what the FBI could do if the White House asked it to.https://twitter.com/senorrinhatch/status/1042228462612828161 …
And, combining both of these issues:https://twitter.com/steventdennis/status/1042251061279506432?s=21 …
(And, if you clicked on the link to the People article from Ginni Thomas you’ll get an eye-opening/eye-popping view into the way mass-media reacted even after the Thomas confirmation hearings.)
And, a tweet from Trump that speaks so softly it barely exists.https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1042258387730399233?s=21 …
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.