The ruling of the US District Court in DC was set to take effect on Sept. 17. Here is Crossroads request for an emergency stay, which was submitted to Roberts on Friday:https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4887732-18A274-Stay-App.html …
-
-
Show this thread
-
Here is CREW's opposition to the stay request, filed earlier today:https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4887730-18A274-CREW-Opp-to-Stay.html …
Show this thread -
Here is the underlying 113-page opinion from DC District Court Chief Judge Howell tossing out a longstanding FEC regulation — and explaining, broadly, what the heck this is all about. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4887735-CREW-v-FEC-Opinion-080318.html …pic.twitter.com/QJzOYk7X4T
Show this thread -
-
In short, under a longstanding FEC rule about what you have to disclose when making an independent expenditure, Crossroads GPS (and the FEC eventually) argued that donor disclosure is only required if the donation is made for the *specific communication* being disclosed.
Show this thread -
CREW and Howell said that's wrong under the law, regardless of the rule, so the rule must go. Howell gave the FEC time to pass a new rule, which they didn't do, and the ruling was set to go into effect on Monday.
Show this thread -
Stays were sought without resolution from Howell and the DC Circuit, leading Crossroads to file the request for a stay at SCOTUS. All such requests go to an individual justice initially, and Roberts is assigned the DC Circuit.
Show this thread -
In the interim, both the DC Circuit and District Court denied the stay applications filed in those courts — leaving SCOTUS as the only available outlet.
Show this thread -
Such stay applications directed to individual justices at the Supreme Court can be acted on individually or referred to the full court. They often are referred in contested matters.
Show this thread -
The language in Roberts' stay order about "pending further order" suggests he views this as a temporary measure, put in place to keep Howell's ruling from going into effect until the full Supreme Court can decide how it wishes to resolve the stay application request.
Show this thread -
Nonetheless, absent further action, the district court's ruling striking down the FEC rule — which was due to take effect Monday — is on hold now, by order of the Supreme Court.
Show this thread -
The only times I've generally seen such temp, one-justice stays are in death penalty cases from states where, absent a stay, the state will proceed with an execution even while a stay request is pending. In that instance, a single justice will issue a stay while SCOTUS considers.
Show this thread -
And those are instances where it's a stay NOW or death. So, I'm not quite sure why the Chief decided that a Saturday afternoon stay was necessary when the ruling doesn't even go int effect until Monday.
Show this thread -
The question I've been discussing with people is this: Did the Chief Justice's stay just reverse the effect of a 4-4 vote? In other words, previously it would have taken 5 votes to grant a stay. Does this now mean it takes 5 votes for the stay to be lifted?
Show this thread -
To be clear, there have been non-death penalty single-justice stays. There's this example, and a Kennedy stay granted after the 9th Circuit's marriage ruling, for example.https://twitter.com/theglipper/status/1041082381162229761 …
Show this thread -
It is totally possible, as
@theglipper posits, that the Chief simply knows the matter will not be able to be resolved by the full court this weekend and so, rather than making all of the parties wait, he just issued the single-justice stay now rather than Sunday evening.Show this thread -
Side note: This is another instance where the court's procedures and rules seem almost designed to make knowing what is actually going on at the nation's highest court damn near impossible.
Show this thread -
OK, going to try to sum all of this up in as plain of English as I can in two final tweets ...
Show this thread -
Crossroads GPS & the FEC say independent expenditures only need to disclose donors when the donors give specifically for the expense being reported. CREW & the district court say that’s wrong under the law, so the FEC rule is invalid (and more donors would need to be disclosed).
Show this thread -
The district court ruling was due to go into effect Monday, but Chief Justice John Roberts put that ruling on hold this afternoon — meaning the FEC rule will stay in place for now and donors don’t have to be disclosed — pending further action from him or the full Supreme Court.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.