So. So. So. Much going on in these two tweets.pic.twitter.com/Rzgof5WsKt
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Remember, though, that the 25th Amendment is more complicated than we tend to think. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/chrisgeidner/how-the-25th-amendment-actually-works-and-what-nobodys-ever …pic.twitter.com/AlLKTYSMDV
And whenever anyone raises the 25th Amendment, never forget this: "Removing a president through the 25th Amendment requires more votes than removing a president by impeachment ...."https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/chrisgeidner/how-the-25th-amendment-actually-works-and-what-nobodys-ever …
In any event, it's a really stark statement. "Are you and Crazy Louie nuts?" is not the sort of thing I'd expect to see from a former AG. (It is, however, the sort of thing, for better or worse, that I'd not be surprised to hear from someone running for office.)
Lol she’s a disgruntled employee that got fired once they discovered she was a snake and now she’s retaliating in the way that snakes do.
Who cares? I'm just talking about what "TFA" is in his tweet.
You included something Omarosa said and then say “Who cares?” when the full context is provided. Ah I see your style of reporting.
No. You're being ridiculous. Holder tweeted something that included an acronym many might not know. I provided context, literally writing that "TFA, presumably, is a reference to ..." It was obviously not a statement on the substance of Omarosa's comments. Go away, troll.
“Let us try to be good to one another.” Maybe try to follow your own advice. My criticism is still correct. I provided the context and you said “who cares?”. The context matters as your statement involved a White House employee talking about invoking the 25th amendment.
The context does not matter. I was NOT using the Omarosa comments as evidence that there is a 25th Amendment effort/consideration in the White House. I was using it to explain an acronym. That's it. Your unwillingness to acknowledge that ... makes you a troll.
My unwillingness to agree with you makes me a troll. Ah ok. I provided the context to Omarosa’s statement that you used.
You replied “who cares?”. Many Americans would care about the context considering she’s a former White House employee talking about invoking the 25th amendment, a frightening prospect.
Or "Thanks for asking"?
Or "Time for action"!
Oh I like that one better. but he may also be calling DJT and crazy Louie total fatty acids... which I would support BTW.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.