One can critique multiple things as being on different levels. If you can’t allow for that, you’re seeking the same oversimplification of our national dialogue that is at the base of a lot of the Tumpisms that I’m sure you eagerly decry.
-
-
It’s very true. 85% of all of your leads were regarding “emails”. The American voter will go down in history for allowing this, so will the press unfortunately.
-
I wrote ... probably less than five stories about Hillary’s emails the whole election cycle. And I wrote hundreds of stories. So, no. Also: I’m at BuzzFeed, and, as a publication, that was not a story that we covered as even a significant part of our campaign coverage.
-
I wasn’t speaking of you personally, sorry if you misunderstood. Your field of profession.
-
I didn’t misunderstand. You literally said you were talking about everyone because you said “none” of us did it right.pic.twitter.com/mDpxxotBjd
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.