This isn't a new argument; it is what Rudy has been saying. 1. It wasn't a campaign expense 2. He didn't know about it when the payments were made. 3. He later repaid them. Cohen's plea and comments in court contradict the first two points.https://twitter.com/foxandfriends/status/1032319321920430080 …
-
0:50 -
Replying to @chrisgeidner
The point is that it *wasn't* a campaign expense. If the payment was to help the campaign, but wasn't a campaign expense, it was an illegal contribution.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HoyasLalala @chrisgeidner
Cohen said it a) wasn't a "campaign expense," b) it was meant to influence the campaign, and c) was done at Trump's direction. C seems to be the only sticking point here.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @HoyasLalala
We're saying the same thing, but in different ways.
11:02 AM - 22 Aug 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.