Meanwhile, a big loss in court for the Trump administration —>https://twitter.com/ZoeTillman/status/1016480553296646145 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
OK, I get what you’re saying now, but I still think that is missing the reality here, which is that by ignoring the other case they’re ignoring part of the current legal landscape in which they have to implement both the Flores agreement and the new injunction.
I don't disagree, but my point is that this is nothing new. This is simply how they operate. I've made the argument many times that "by ignoring the other case they're ignoring part of the current legal landscape" & sometimes I win, and sometimes I lose, ...
but what *never* happens is that they change their practice and start acknowledging that the world outside exists. To a degree, that's just good lawyering; you analogize to favorable cases and distinguish unfavorable cases. But DOJ takes it to a whole new level.
And mark my words, if people (read, reporters, or possibly Congressmen) start pushing the issue, "I don't comment on ongoing litigation" will come out faster than the questioner can finish the sentence. But I'm not telling you anything you don't already know first-hand. :)
<Checks "mansplained something on the Internet" off the list for today>
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.