WaPo: Regarding possible #SCOTUS nominees, Trump "also wants to see a portfolio of solid academic writing, though this adviser acknowledged Trump does not care to read it; he simply wants to know it exists."https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/we-have-to-pick-a-great-one-inside-trumps-plan-for-a-new-supreme-court-justice/2018/06/30/610dcd4e-7bb0-11e8-80be-6d32e182a3bc_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.cee80f04a375 …
-
-
It also reiterates one of the fundamental things to understanding Trump's nominees and appointments, across the board, in all ways: "Do they look the part?"
Show this thread -
LOL @ Leonard Leo or Don McGahn trying to claim this with a straight face.pic.twitter.com/kko9GXEDWi
Show this thread -
"The president doesn't like to read and needs briefings to be limited to bullet points on one page, but he was talking with us, privately, about his carefully considered views of constitutional interpretation." No, I don't think so.
Show this thread -
Outside of the "looks the part" and "does Trump actually know legal stuff" issues, there's no doubt that the White House and Trump have handled their judicial nominations process with precision and skill. Look at this discipline —>pic.twitter.com/QUX4RRrqgy
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
nobody can read a representative sample of a person's academic writing over a few days; don't be stupid
-
That's ... not true.
-
if you say so
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.