Ah, the “quotes” around “reporters” move. Even if I agreed with your underlying arguments about what is worthy of attention, @MichaelAvenatti, attacking members of the press by suggesting people aren’t “real” reporters isn’t the right way to go about things.https://twitter.com/michaelavenatti/status/1002540764058902528 …
No, I tweeted two tweets. You have made me spend far more time than I ever would have spent on this. I've moved on to other things and am doing my job. In order to help do so, since you don't care to look at my work and are making absurd assumptions, I'm going to stop responding.
-
-
No one is calling you a piece of shit. If I wanted to I would have no problem. Instead I’m criticizing specific behaviors and your response is to simply deny the reality we can all see. That’s not the domain of a journalist, it’s the domain of a demagogue.
-
Not pro Trump, but I prefer to face the raw truth wether or not to my liking. Imo
@chrisgeidner just points to an article which puts (partly) the story in a different light. As he says: he covers.. stipulating that Trump’s dealings are his specific task. -
He doesn’t cover well though, that’s in fact my exact issue, being exemplified by this smaller illustrative instance.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The problem with the press is you refuse to see the legitimate critiques when people are legitimately critiquing you. You seem to take them as personal attacks by bad faith actors and you respond as such. You are accountable to the public and you should do better.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It is worrisome that you both engaged this effort and are continuing to defend it by downplaying my legitimate critiques, because that’s what all the worst people are currently doing, including the worst people in the media.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.