Chris Eidhof
JP Simard
@chriseidhof nice writeup! Though I don't know how the "F" in FRP helps here. It seems to me that it's the "reactive" part that matters
I wrote something about an alternative to the responder chain: http://chris.eidhof.nl/post/responder-chain-alternative/ …
-
-
- View other replies
-
@simjp I added a note about that, thanks!
-
-
-
@chriseidhof agreed with your assessment of Rx. Seems ideal, but debugging it is as maddening as debugging bindings in my experience. - View other replies
-
@cocoaphony@chriseidhof same. Bindings and Chaining provide much joy writing new code for me. Joy evaporates when maintaining and extending -
@cocoaphony@chriseidhof it's the level of effort to remember why a particular chain or binding worked that hurts downstream comprehension - View other replies
-
@RyanCumley yeah. Getting it working initially is a glorious, magical experience. Later, the code is still…magical.
-
-
-
@chriseidhof Responder chain is also a great example of the Expression Problem: open set of responder types + open set of actions. - Show more
-
-
@chriseidhof Simplicity over ease of use is a very good point. Kids, it is not cool to write code that is hard to refactor or debug! -
@chriseidhof Tank for the post. Would love to hear your thoughts on this approach: https://gist.github.com/uberbruns/8b56077e713a5a6e72aeb478de68d3d8 …
Rob Napier
Ryan Cumley
Joe Groff
Nils Breunese
Karsten Bruns
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.