But railroads
-
-
-
I was wondering if Oxford theologians are now narrow cost benefit utilitarians, - have deontological claims been thoroughly routed by the economists' god of Mammon?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Is this the guy who did something silly a while back
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh I am so pleased/proud of this letter, as I was so horrified by the project [think tank]. Thank you to all of the writers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fascinating how history has become theology, labelling bits of the past good or evil rather than things to be understood.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's incredible that had to be written.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gosh. I agree with them on the broad anti-Biggar point but it’s a *really* bad article. Good and evil are ‘useless’ to historians? They’re not even ‘useless’ to scientists. Biggar will no doubt feel vindicated.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Continue standing up to simplification.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
loving the new handle
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They mean good and evil are useless to historians as an ‘answer’ to it. I am an historian, graduated with the
@OpenUniversity and studied Empire throughout & it is not possible to describe its causes or effects as simply good or evil. It is WAY more complex than thatThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.