Useful mental model: You can think of on-site or new employees two weeks from now as remote. How are they going to know what decision you made today in that face-to-face meeting? How do they ask questions about it? How do they make changes to it?
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
two years from now when someone is asking why this thing exists and if we can remove it, who's going to know?
Prikaži ovu nit -
How do you convey the context for why a decision was made at a particular time? How do you find out if that's still true without a written record of why it happened in the first place?
Prikaži ovu nit -
Especially in tech, where so much of our software is created, maintained, documented, and thrives based on the work of people collaborating across different continents: Ask yourself why you can't make remote work and how the same issues affect your on-site employees.
Prikaži ovu nit - Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I understand what you’re getting at but it’s not that simple.
-
that sounds like an excuse to continue with the current state of things tbh
- Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
-
We have some unique ifnrastructure needs for Windows OS dev teams, since we need specialized hardware (2TB NVME M.2s) and a few other things that make it a needed remote. But your point still stands, this infra exposes the weakness of the flow & fact that it wouldn't work remote
-
Needed onsite, not remote**** but we still have a few that make it work (?)
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.