Chris Stewart

@Chris_Stewart_5

Hard work always pays off GPG: 0x7FBB368E0B660A84A158085A9846ECEFBF0788BE

Iowa
Joined January 2013
182 Photos and videos Photos and videos

Tweets

You blocked @Chris_Stewart_5

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @Chris_Stewart_5

  1. 23 hours ago

    Metallica has still got it! Awesome show

    2 likes
  2. Jun 9
    Replying to

    You would think they would be heavily vested in better fee algorithms -- but I guess it is just easier to pass the cost onto the end user

    1 like
  3. Jun 9

    I guess we shouldn't be surprised at bitcoin exchanges fixing tx fees. Most show little desire to improve core infrastructure.

    1 reply 1 like
  4. Jun 7

    Transaction fees in bitcoin seem to be responding to a smaller mempool size. Doubt fees drop to pre 5/2017 levels

  5. Retweeted
    Jun 7

    BLAM!!

    19 replies 196 retweets 339 likes
  6. Jun 6
    Replying to

    More from him here as well:

  7. Jun 6

    Interesting posts by /u/DeviateFish_ on fee markets in crypto, he talks about ETH, but applies to BTC as well:

    1 reply
  8. Jun 6

    Interesting the mempool size has stayed constant during this price rise, sitting at ~45MB as of now:

    1 retweet 2 likes
  9. Jun 4
    Replying to

    Core will iterate on the tech and make it better. End result will be bitcoin's consensus rules controlled by users - not oligarchs (miners)

    2 likes
  10. Jun 4

    UASF is perfect for bitcoin, BIP148 by is the first iteration

    1 reply 1 like
  11. May 31

    For any late night computer users redshift/f.lux are a must. Makes staring at a screen so much easier on the eyes!

    1 retweet 1 like
  12. May 29
    Replying to

    Very similar to what might happen if miners decide not to adopt a UASF

    1 reply 1 like
  13. May 29

    Here is what a chain split might look like, we had one in July 2015 because miners weren't enforcing a soft fork:

    1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes
  14. Retweeted
    May 29

    Land of the free, because of the brave |

    1 reply 96 retweets 489 likes
  15. May 28

    First implementation of payment channels in bitcoin-s:

    5 likes
  16. May 25
    Replying to

    If you are proposing something new, you have to expect a lot of criticism. Only the most robust, well thought out BIPs/code can be accepted

    1 retweet 3 likes
  17. May 25

    Contrary to popular opinion Core devs have been extremely helpful to me learning how bitcoin works. Not sure why they get such a bad rap

    2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes
  18. May 23

    Its fascinating to watch the Bitcoin community fight changes to the protocol that are contentious. Like white blood cells attacking bacteria

    1 reply 4 retweets 30 likes
  19. May 23
    Replying to

    This will have to be supported for YEARS. Most of the companies on that list have never contributed to core development

    1 like
  20. May 23
    Replying to

    Who is going to support the new HF codebase? I doubt Core devs r going to spend endless hours for an idea directly against the ethos of btc

    1 reply 1 like

@Chris_Stewart_5 hasn't Tweeted yet.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·