Three fun ideas: 1) If you can easily describe what you're working on, it's not ambitious enough. 2) It's better to be world-class at one rare and valuable skill than to be good at a lot of things. 3) Master one communication skill. Speaking, writing, drawing. You pick.
-
-
Replying to @david_perell
#2 is contra-stablishment. I think
@naval and others recommend to be top 10% on two skills that very few people have instead of trying to be top 1% on one skill. Thoughts?2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes
“Top 10% in multiple domains” appears to have a lot more surface area → more attainablehttps://www.lesswrong.com/posts/XvN2QQpKTuEzgkZHY/being-the-pareto-best-in-the-world …
0 replies
0 retweets
9 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
