self-actualized donkey from shrek 2

@choosy_mom

🧑🏻‍🔬⚡️🧪 you have to make your own potion

sf
Vrijeme pridruživanja: prosinac 2017.

Medijski sadržaj

  1. including (especially) e-girls

  2. Odgovor korisnicima

    abundance is a blessing and a curse maybe all you really need is *enough*

  3. Odgovor korisniku/ci

    nobody told me i could feel this way about corn...

  4. The CDC estimates that the flu has infected 15M+ and killed more than 8,000 Americans since October (including 54 children) I don't mean to trivialize it, but how much of the coronavirus hype is fueled by geopolitics, racism, and revenue-per-click media?

  5. A lot more to talk about here, but I'll end the thread with this very real graph from Dunbar's 'Anatomy of Friendship' (2017), my favorite academic paper of all time

    Prikaži ovu nit
  6. While it's impressive to understand how effective we are at creating large social graphs, it's important to remember that human communities are a means to an end: longevity, health, and well-being

    Prikaži ovu nit
  7. In addition to gossip/storytelling, humans also facilitate group cohesion through several other unique verbal and sub-verbal activities, including writing, singing, dancing, and laughter Altogether, Dunbar estimates that our tools are 2-3x more effective than social grooming

    Prikaži ovu nit
  8. Enter language: "Not only can speech be combined with almost every other activity, but it can also be used to address several different individuals simultaneously." Compared to physical grooming, language is *insanely* scalable and efficient as a vector for social bonding

    Prikaži ovu nit
  9. Humans don't do nearly as much grooming as other apes, and even if we did, we couldn't possibly afford to do it enough to build groups of 150+ individuals

    Prikaži ovu nit
  10. Apes maintain group cohesion through 'social grooming', where they pick bugs and debris out of their companions' fur Across species, more grooming enables stronger relationships and larger group sizes The most social non-human apes spend about 20% of their time grooming

    Prikaži ovu nit
  11. Dunbar has done similar research with other apes, including chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans, among others Interestingly, Dunbar's number for chimpanzees is around 50—a group size at which most observed chimpanzee tribes begin to fracture

    Prikaži ovu nit
  12. Romantic relationships also tend to crowd out other Dunbar slots, if only temporarily. Ever had a friend fall in love, then drop off the face of the earth?

    Prikaži ovu nit
  13. This has a lot to do with time scarcity and frequency requirements Most of us contact our primary partners daily, but Dunbar proposes that you need to interact with a friend at least weekly to qualify for the 5-layer, monthly for the 15-layer, and annually for the 150-layer

    Prikaži ovu nit
  14. According to Dunbar, most people spend the majority of their social time and energy inside their first three layers

    Prikaži ovu nit
  15. There a lot of ways to define and circumscribe each layer of relationships, but Dunbar roughly describes them as: - primary partner (1.5) - intimate friends (5) - best friends (15) - good friends (50) - 'just' friends (150) - acquaintances (500) - names/faces (1500)

    Prikaži ovu nit
  16. What most people don't know is that Dunbar's number describes only one of the concentric circles of relations surrounding an individual They scale by roughly a factor of 3, and "frequency of contact, emotional closeness, and altruism all decline across successive circles"

    Prikaži ovu nit
  17. This phenomenon is an emergent property—or an intentional organizational principle—of many kinds of social coordination systems (e.g. villages, academia, military, corporations)

    Prikaži ovu nit
  18. Dunbar's number is a perennial pop psychology headline (You Can Only Have 150 Friends!?! 😱), but in my experience, most people view it to be a pretty plausible theory for social relations

    Prikaži ovu nit
  19. me every day on social media, liking all the posts on my TL

  20. Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Haven’t seen it described so succinctly before but this makes so much sense, especially if you’re planning a paradigm-shifting maneuver You have to move all your pieces at once, otherwise your opponents will be able to mobilize and protect themselves

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·