@charliespiering It's the Klain part that we have a problem with more than the czar part.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, yes RT
@charliespiering: Josh Earnest hints that some Repubs and pundits are calling Klain a Czar as if it was a “derogatory” term -
@michelelfrost Me, I'd like to see where "Czars" are permitted by the Constitution. There is supposed to be congressional oversight. -
@michelelfrost But the czars are only accountable to the president. Strictly unconstitutional. -
@ROCKInTheUSSA Yep. If you're making policy decisions you need to have oversight, period
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Czar" IS derogatory, IMO. We're a constitutional republic. The whole notion of "Czars" is just goofy
@charliespiering @RialbyBlogger -
@GadsdenJazz To be honest we *were* a Constitutional Republic 'til Obama shredded it & Congress did nothing.@charliespiering @RialbyBlogger
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@charliespiering When dems cheer Klain because he "can control the messaging", then yes, he's mock worthy for other than "czar" title.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@charliespiering How's this: Obama is the Rex Ryan of US Presidents. He royally fucks shit up for 6 years and never is held accountable.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@charliespiering I don't like the word Czar or, for that matter, "homeland". One reminds me of Russia & Ussr the or Nazi Germany.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.