Also shows that Trump wanted the ambassador out BEFORE Biden announced he was running.
-
-
-
The ambassador was rightfully let go. 1. He didnt need a reason 2. Regardless he has a reason she was very vocal about her hate towards him to other people. The only thing I want to know more about is he said he didnt know this guy. Why are they talking about the amb?
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The recording was at a private event, and by law, recording requires one party consent....since the person recording, was present, that is the lawful one part consent. The only illegal thing happening, is the POTUS directing NON GOVT henchman to "get rid" of the US AMBASSADOR!
-
Obviously the person(s) he was talking to could indeed get the message to the proper ppl who handle firing. But Trump himself is the EXECUTIVE top dog and as such can fire himself or tell anyone to ‘take care of’ the firing. Btw, Florida is a 2party consent state.
pic.twitter.com/GRM0dgY5gC
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I'm beginning to think AG Barr is afraid of what might actually come out if he starts to prosecute some of these people. Once someone gets a subpoena and starts talking where will it end?






-
I get what you are saying, but maybe its time,open up the can of worms,and see how many crawl out.There is so much corruption on both sides,if we are going to be honest,and if enough people,or the right people,go to jail maybe things would change.Good point
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This is a very serious charge and requires prosecution.
-
ABSOLUTELY
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.