I am sure that the founders would have been fine with reasonable gun control regulations.
-
-
-
To gun control opponents the opening part of 2nd Amendment is just meaningless words. I think a "well regulated militia" means what it implies.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Congress and the White House need to be the gun targets. Shoot at those fucking assholes that have NRA money falling out of their wallets. That would change the gun laws....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is, of course, insane.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Firearms in the late 1700s consisted of flintlocks. They could not have even imagined a gun capable of firing dozens of rounds within seconds, which then can be reloaded to do it again easily.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The same NRA wouldn't allow guns into their own convention!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Its quite shocking that sane people in America can argue against tighter gun controls. Nowhere else in the western world has your gunlaws & these senseless, brutal massacres.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The NRA (gun manufacturer) argument boils down to a belief that massacres are part of the price of DOING BUSINESS.
-
This isn't and has never been about the 2nd Amendment. It's about MONEY. Specifically, the PROFITS of gun manufacturers. The NRA is to gun manufacturers as the Tobacco Institute was to Big Tobacco.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.