Whatever it is, you can be sure it's operationally relative.
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
He's operating in a thoroughly post-christian paradigm here, meaning something like net value to society. Equality under gods eyes is less and less meaningful as a definition to the younger, godless generations. Science, and the constitution, hope the concept is picked up though
-
The value of undeveloped land Changes as knowledge of agriculture, construction, science's, etc change Impartiality strikes me as everyone's least bad option given no choice in being born
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Economic output - annoyance factor = moral worth
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I think this is a good definition: https://twitter.com/DanDemetriou/status/1224090715669458945?s=19 … How do we establish the innate equality of moral worth in human beings, in spite of a) differences between human beings (through nature, nurture, and their choices), and b) the fact humans are more valuable than animals?
-
If you're asking me, I don't believe in the innate equality of all humans, nor do I think all humans have a higher moral value than animals. In a trolley situation, we'd typically choose some people over others, and some animals over people, if we knew all the facts about them.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Most versions of spirituality handle this nicely: Humans can only judge actions, not other humans. Using superstition, or statistics, to judge individuals is wrong because judging individuals is wrong.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
If the operational definition is anything like "beings we should strive to avoid harming," one would think intelligence has to be factored in there somewhere, which is why we're less comfy harming dolphins and chimps than fruit flies and mice
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I’d say something like: the non-instrumental value of something that should be weighed in considering how to treat it.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.