Another disgracefully smear-filled--not to mention factually sloppy--review of a genetics book from Nathaniel Comfort. Why do Nature keep asking this guy to write for them?https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06784-5 …
-
-
This tendentious rant barely merits the description of "review". It is SO bad! The final petulant "I oppose him" is pathetic. A review should not be at the level of polemic: it should critique the case carefully and accurately.
-
Did neolithic goat herders know more about heredity than goodthinker Comfort? Serious question
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.