this is dumb. it's inarguable that if this guy had opened fire on that intersection with a gun, we'd have more dead bodies
-
-
-
You’re making a general case that guns are more deadly than bombs. That’s extremely silly.
-
Also silly: Pointing to a failed bombing attempt to make the case that your hypothetical gun attack would be more deadly.
-
But as I say, I understand that it’s annoying that this story isn’t about what you want it to be about.
-
thank you for reading my mine, Charles. I'm just happy no one died. Call me crazy!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I'm happy no one died. <fin>
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
a series of things happened, him choosing to use bombs, them being discovered, etc that meant no one died.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Just imagine how much more horrible it would have been if McVeigh had a gun instead....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We should be glad he didn't have access to an assault weapon.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Charles Anger, anger the nation is getting angrier and angrier both Christians and Muslims.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@redsteeze@chrislhayes<=this fool would be all sanctimonious with his gun-grabbing narrative.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
hopefully those terrorists don't get any more ideas from deplorable NAZI frog trump supporters!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.