Charles Ries

@charles_ries

Vice President, International and senior fellow at . Former U.S. ambassador. Opinions mine, retweets not endorsements.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: svibanj 2011.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @charles_ries

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @charles_ries

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    12. pro 2017.

    Launched our study this morning. Finds UK economy likely to suffer under most scenarios. Thanks to for hosting and for moderating. Thanks also to for supporting game theory chapter.

    Poništi
  2. 29. sij

    In the upcoming phase of intensive negotiations w/ the EU, the UK will need to weigh the potential short-term economic effects of prolonged trade policy uncertainty against the potential negative long-term effects of an agreement that is made quickly but lacks comprehensiveness.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. 29. sij

    The negative economic costs associated with such uncertainty would rise over time. If the renegotiation period extends to 2025, UK GDP could be reduced by £11 billion, with additional annual borrowing costs increasing to almost £3 billion.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. 29. sij

    We found that by the end of 2020, UK GDP could be £4.4 billion (or about 0.17 percentage points) lower than if the UK had not been renegotiating its future economic relationship with the EU. The additional annual cost of extra borrowing would be almost £1.3 billion.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 29. sij

    These costs mainly stem from the reluctance of investors and traders to make longer term commitments related to UK-EU relations until they know the arrangements — trade, quotas and regulatory — that will apply going forward.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 29. sij

    Though is happening, many aspects of Britain’s future economic and political relationships with the EU are still to be determined. Our new study examines the economic costs associated with such uncertainty.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Further trade uncertainty related to could cost the UK economy billions. New report from , , and colleagues:

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    Beyond Brexit: understanding the potential economic implications of prolonged trade policy uncertainty ⁦⁩ ⁦⁩ ⁦

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    10. pro 2019.

    1/6 Ever wondered what a peace agreement for might look like? today published a detailed report from a study I led answering that question.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi
  11. 17. ruj 2019.

    As in other parts of the world, in the Middle East taking down barriers to trade clearly benefits economic growth. Our new study is here and accompanying nifty calculator is here: .

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Thanks to today's speakers and the for partnering on such a great event on the Hill today on risk and diplomacy.

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    6. ruj 2019.

    Today is my last day at . How do you sum up 12.5 years of a job that's always been more than just a job? A few things that stand out (with apologies for the descent into sentimentality)...

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 27. kol 2019.

    But that also requires figuring out what China really wants from the West, and making sure they don’t get it without making the changes we’d like to see. /end

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 27. kol 2019.

    By the scale of their economy and its central planning aspects, China is different from any other player in global trade. That means the U.S. should approach them in a strategic way, bringing together on our side other global players, rather than tackling it unilaterally. 12/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 27. kol 2019.

    That means longer term complications for supply chains are likely — whether there is a deal or not. 11/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 27. kol 2019.

    But in general, the Chinese seem to be playing a long game for prestige (face) reasons and because China may assess that the U.S. might well renege on anything it might offer about component manufactures tariffs. 10/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 27. kol 2019.

    The Chinese strategy seems to be to offer better FDI terms (though that’s a throwaway because it doesn’t seem to be a core objective of the U.S.) and to offer to buy more U.S. soybeans for now (easily reversed by the government when it wants to pressure the USG). 9/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 27. kol 2019.

    This seems evident because finished goods were the last tranche of tariffs announced, and possibly already withdrawn. Hard to see that being the basis of any deal, though. 8/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 27. kol 2019.

    To get such an outcome, the U.S. hopes to only commit to remove tariffs on finished goods (esp. textiles, apparel, and footwear; maybe consumer electronics). 7/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·