has this conversation actually happened yet? anarchist: "i'm in favor of human freedom" progressive: "human freedom means people can choose to be racist so promoting human freedom is racist"
-
-
I have no point to make. My question was out of curiosity. Since I find there are varying interpretations of the matter between old and new text I just seek to improve my understanding of the anarchist.
-
it seems to me like it'd take a pretty idiosyncratic take to call oneself an anarchist and not be centrally concerned with human freedom, but i'm sure somebody out there has pulled it off
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.