that's a construction of it, but i don't imagine for a moment that that's what JBP wants. he's said what he wants: "social convention favoring stable pair bonding". y'know, nice wholesome stuff like families sternly but lovingly teaching their scions to stay married
okay, come to it in your own time if you ain't gonna listen i guess you will find that statistically insignificant causes are blamed all out of proportion to their effects when they make people resentful of the power they feel they're supposed to have and don't
-
-
hmm, I think we're slipping off point here. My point is that what Peterson has *said* is uncontraversial. What he *means* is something I've not yet concluded, I'm still gathering evidence. Now, you clearly feel you know what he means. You may be right...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
but you've not made a convincing argument, and given that I'm seeing utter hysteria over this guy, I want to figure out what he stands for myself. As with the James Delore issue previously a lot of the things attributed to him may be lies.
-
okeydokey, no fault to be found with that procedure
-
The only reason I'm really bothering to look into him is he's getting grassroots support, and people are calling for him and his followers to be murdered. This makes me feel I should really know more.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Watching him speak he seems rational and principled. But so far I've not seen him get to any really contraversial topics, and he's mainly been defending himself from dishonest attacks from others. This has made him look way better than his detractors.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.