this is the correct wayhttps://twitter.com/chaosprime/status/997964886536749057 …
if we lived in an enforced monogamy society in the way Peterson wants, it would be nonsensical for Peterson to suggest we could change to an enforced monogamy society to solve our problems
-
-
I agree, it would! That's why I think he must be suggesting government-mandated-gf if he's suggesting anything. This raises another issue, which is the number of people following alternative lifestyles in this regard is still very few, so they can't be the cause of troubles.
-
okay, come to it in your own time if you ain't gonna listen i guess you will find that statistically insignificant causes are blamed all out of proportion to their effects when they make people resentful of the power they feel they're supposed to have and don't
-
hmm, I think we're slipping off point here. My point is that what Peterson has *said* is uncontraversial. What he *means* is something I've not yet concluded, I'm still gathering evidence. Now, you clearly feel you know what he means. You may be right...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
our society is effectively an enforced monogamy society, and it couldn't get much more so, so it will be interesting to see what Peterson is getting at when he brings this up. I don't see polyamory as having a significant impact on our society.
-
it doesn't, the impact that is interpreted by incels as relevant to their problems is the practical capacity of women to choose to go unpartnered
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.